FACTORS SUCH AS PSYCHOSOCIAL SUPPORT, ANXIETY, AND HEALTHCARE FACILITIES INFLUENCE THE CHOICE OF BIRTHPLACE WITH SELF‑EFFICACY AS A MODERATING VARIABLE
Abstrak
The choice of delivery location is an important decision for pregnant women, influenced by both internal and external factors such as psychosocial support, psychological condition, and perceptions of healthcare facilities. This study aims to analyze the influence of psychosocial support, anxiety, and healthcare facilities on pregnant women’s decisions regarding delivery location, as well as to examine the role of self-efficacy as a moderating variable. A quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design was employed, involving 100 third-trimester pregnant women who regularly attended prenatal check-ups within the working areas of Poasia Health Center (40 respondents), Mokoau Health Center (33 respondents), and Lepo-lepo Health Center (27 respondents). The sample was determined using the purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through a five-point Likert scale questionnaire and analyzed using SmartPLS 4 with a PLS-SEM approach. The results revealed that psychosocial support (p = 0.000) and anxiety (p = 0.000) had significant effects, whereas perceptions of healthcare facilities (p = 0.102) and self-efficacy (p = 0.266) had no significant influence, either directly or as a moderating variable. In conclusion, the choice of delivery location is more strongly determined by social support and psychological conditions than by facility-related factors or individual self-confidence.
Artikel teks lengkap
Referensi
2. BKPK Kemenkes. Hasil Utama SKI 2023.; 2023.
3. Syairaji M, Nurdiati DS, Wiratama BS, Prüst ZD, Bloemenkamp KWM, Verschueren KJC. Trends and causes of maternal mortality in Indonesia: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024;24(1):515. doi:10.1186/s12884-024-06687-6
4. Gülmezoglu AM, Lawrie TA, Hezelgrave N, et al. Interventions to Reduce Maternal and Newborn Morbidity and Mortality. In: Black RE, Laxminarayan R, Temmerman M, Walker N, eds. Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health: Disease Control Priorities. 3rd ed. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2016. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0348-2_ch7
5. Actis Danna V, Bedwell C, Wakasiaka S, Lavender T. Utility of the three-delays model and its potential for supporting a solution-based approach to accessing intrapartum care in low- and middle-income countries. A qualitative evidence synthesis. Glob Health Action. 2020;13(1):1819052. doi:10.1080/16549716.2020.1819052
6. Organization WH. World Health Statistics 2020: Monitoring Health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. WHO; 2020.
7. Kurniawati W, Tong CW, Lantu N, et al. Test Validity of The Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale (PrAS) for Pregnant Women in Indonesia: A Pilot Study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. Published online 2024:1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4314074/v1
8. Sari DAP, Indriani D. Literature Review : Determinan Terjadinya Kehamilan Tidak Diinginkan Pada Remaja di Indonesia. Media Gizi Kesmas. 2021;10(2):343-351.
9. Masoumi SZ, Kashanian M, Arab E, Sheikhansari N, Arab R. A comparison between pregnancy outcome in women in 15 to 19 and 20 to 35 years age group. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:140. doi:10.14196/mjiri.31.140
10. Lee H. Family economic hardship and children’s behavioral and socio-emotional outcomes in middle childhood: Direct and indirect pathways. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022;138:106527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106527
11. Calhoun CD, Stone KJ, Cobb AR, Patterson MW, Danielson CK, Bendezú JJ. The Role of Social Support in Coping with Psychological Trauma: An Integrated Biopsychosocial Model for Posttraumatic Stress Recovery. Psychiatr Q. 2022;93(4):949-970. doi:10.1007/s11126-022-10003-w
12. Sufredini F, Catling C, Zugai J, Chang S. The effects of social support on depression and anxiety in the perinatal period: A mixed-methods systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2022;319:119-141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.005
13. Kementrian Kesehatan. Profil Kesehatan. Kemenkes RI; 2023.
14. Lippke S. Self-Efficacy Theory BT - Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford TK, eds. Springer International Publishing; 2020:4722-4727. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1167
15. Kułak-Bejda A, Avci Aydin I, Çelik Eren D, et al. Impact of Pregnancy on Self-Efficacy and Personal Competence in the Context of Risk of Depression, Mental Health Status, and Satisfaction with Life. J Clin Med. 2024;13(2). doi:10.3390/jcm13020533
16. Dinkes Kesehatan Kota Kendari. Profil Dinas Kesehatan Kota Kendari.; 2023.
17. Afulani P, Kusi C, Kirumbi L, Walker D. Companionship during facility-based childbirth: results from a mixed-methods study with recently delivered women and providers in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):150. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1806-1
18. Anderson TL, Valiauga R, Tallo C, et al. Contributing Factors to the Rise in Adolescent Anxiety and Associated Mental Health Disorders: A Narrative Review of Current Literature. J child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs Off Publ Assoc Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurses, Inc. 2025;38(1):e70009. doi:10.1111/jcap.70009
19. Vakulenko Y, Arsenovic J, Hellström D, Shams P. Does delivery service differentiation matter? Comparing rural to urban e-consumer satisfaction and retention. J Bus Res. 2022;142:476-484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.079
20. Kleppang AL, Steigen AM, Finbråten HS. Explaining variance in self-efficacy among adolescents: the association between mastery experiences, social support, and self-efficacy. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1665. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16603-w
21. Hu X, Jiang Y, Bi H. Measuring science self-efficacy with a focus on the perceived competence dimension: using mixed methods to develop an instrument and explore changes through cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses in high school. Int J STEM Educ. 2022;9(1):47. doi:10.1186/s40594-022-00363-x
22. Liu YC, Hung YY. Self-efficacy as the moderator: Exploring driving factors of perceived social support for mainland Chinese students in Taiwan. Comput Human Behav. 2016;64:455-462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.018
23. Bohren MA, Saad CA, Kabore C, et al. Women’s experiences of and satisfaction with childbirth: Development and validation of a measurement scale for low- and middle-income countries. PLoS One. 2025;20(5):e0322132.
Penulis
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.