LEVEL OF AWARENESS OF ADOLESCENT REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH IN BANDUNG CITY
Abstrak
The global commitment to build the future facing the Megatrends facing all countries is to create generational success by emphasizing the elimination of poverty and hunger, inequality and intergenerational injustice. Adolescent health is influenced by values, religion, culture, family, and health services to achieve access to reproductive health services as the key to the Sustainable Development Goals. This aimed to get an overview of the description of the level of adolescent reproductive awareness in the city of Bandung, including aspects of access, understanding, appraising, and use of adolescent reproductive health services. The research was conducted with a cross-sectional design, this research instrument was in the form of 44 questions, consisting of 4 sub-components including accessing, understanding, appraising, and applying regarding adolescent awareness about reproductive health developed from the Stormacq research. The research was carried out quantitatively and qualitatively. The results of this study concluded that adolescent access to adolescent reproductive health was at a moderate level of 69%, and it was found that low access to reproductive health was 11%. Meanwhile, the understanding of adolescent reproductive health was found at a low level of 12%. Regarding the ability of adolescents to analyze reproductive health, it is still in the category of reproductive health level, while in terms of Appraising/assessing reproductive health in the moderate category is 68%. The suggestion was that to increase adolescents' awareness, extensive education is needed, through social media, followed by intensive personal consultation.
Artikel teks lengkap
Referensi
2. UNICEF. The Future of Childhood in a Changing World. 1st ed.; 2024. Accessed March 11, 2025. https://www.unicef.org/media/165156/file/SOWC-2024-full-report-EN.pdf
3. Morris JL, Rushwan H. Adolescent sexual and reproductive health: The global challenges. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):S40-S42. doi:10.1016/J.IJGO.2015.02.006
4. Barreix M, Tunçalp Ö, Mutombo N, et al. Experience from a multi-country initiative to improve the monitoring of selected reproductive health indicators in Africa. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;137(2):205-212. doi:10.1002/IJGO.12105
5. Shaw D. Access to sexual and reproductive health for young people: Bridging the disconnect between rights and reality. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;106(2):132-136. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.03.025
6. Ninsiima LR, Chiumia IK, Ndejjo R. Factors influencing access to and utilisation of youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):135. doi:10.1186/S12978-021-01183-Y/TABLES/1
7. Kumah A, Aidoo LA, Amesawu VE, Issah AR, Nutakor HS. Assessment of Structural and Process Factors in Delivering Quality Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Ghana. Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024;7(1):1-8. doi:10.36401/jqsh-23-20
8. Schmid AT. Exploring sexual and reproductive health education for individuals labeled as intellectually disabled – A constructivist grounded theory. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2024;9(March):100880. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100880
9. Braeken D, Rondinelli I. Sexual and reproductive health needs of young people: Matching needs with systems. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;119(SUPPL.1):60-63. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.03.019
10. Nuwabaine L, Sserwanja Q, Kamara K, Musaba MW. Prevalence and factors associated with teenage pregnancy in Sierra Leone: evidence from a nationally representative Demographic and Health Survey of 2019. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1-8. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-15436-x
11. UNFPA Indonesia. Leaving No One Behind in a Global Crisis through Universal Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services and Information. Published online 2022.
12. Tingey L, Chambers R, Goklish N, et al. Rigorous evaluation of a pregnancy prevention program for American Indian youth and adolescents: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):1-8. doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1842-6
13. De Groot R, Kuunyem MY, Palermo T, et al. Child marriage and associated outcomes in northern Ghana: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1-12. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5166-6
14. Shahnaz R, Karim R. Providing Microfinance and Social Space to Empower Adolescent Girls: An Evaluation of BRACâ€TMs ELA Centres. Work Pap. 2010;7(3).
15. Rumble L, Peterman A, Irdiana N, Triyana M, Minnick E. An empirical exploration of female child marriage determinants in Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):407. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5313-0
16. Dickens B. Ethical considerations on the health consequences of child or adolescent marriage. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;128(1):83-84. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.002
17. Mcguire MF, Ortega E, Riley-Powell AR, Patel R, Paz-Soldan VA. Seeking information and services associated with reproductive health among rural Peruvian young adults: Exploratory qualitative research from Amazonas, Peru. Reprod Health. Published online 2023:1-12. doi:10.1186/s12978-024-01769-2
18. Daniel EE, Masilamani R, Rahman M. The effect of community-based reproductive health communication interventions on contraceptive use among young married couples in Bihar, India. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2008;34(4):189-197. doi:10.1363/3418908
19. Eerdewijk A Van, Newton J, Tyszler M, Wong F, Vaast C. A Conceptual Model of Women and Girls’ Empowerment. Bill Melinda Gates Found. 2017;(June):1-12.
20. Kashyap SP, Ashwathy AN, Pai S, Ajith S, Jochan GM, Banerjee T. Sexual Health Awareness Scale (S.H.A.S). Int J Indian Psychol. 2022;10(4):17. doi:10.25215/1004.074
21. Odo AN, Ofuebe JI, Anike AI, Samuel ES. Predictors of young people’s use of sexual and reproductive health services in Nigeria: a mixed-method approach. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1-8. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-10022-x
22. Getachew S, Abate L, Asres A, Mandefro A. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice toward Youth-Friendly Reproductive Health Services among Mizan-Tepi University Students, South-Western Ethiopia. Sci World J. 2022;2022. doi:10.1155/2022/2312407
23. Francés-García F, La Parra-Casado D, Sanchís-Ramón MJ, Camacho MFR, Gil-González D. Empowerment evaluation: Key methodology aspects from participatory research and intervention with Roma girls. Child Soc. 2023;(February):1-17. doi:10.1111/chso.12716
24. Lee-Rife S, Malhotra A, Warner A, Glinski AM. What Works to Prevent Child Marriage: A Review of the Evidence. Stud Fam Plann. 2012;43(4):287-303. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00327.x
25. Kushtiwala and Iqbal H. Agency aspirations and citizenship Non‐formal education from the perspective of.pdf. Child Soc. 2023;37(37)::2123–2138. doi:10.1111/chso.12796
26. Corney T, Cooper T, Shier H, Williamson H. Youth participation: Adultism, human rights and professional youth work. Child Soc. 2022;36(4):677-690. doi:10.1111/chso.12526
27. Stormacq C, Bachmann AO, Van den Broucke S, Bodenmann P. How socioeconomically disadvantaged people access, understand, appraise, and apply health information: A qualitative study exploring health literacy skills. PLoS One. 2023;18(8 August):1-32. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0288381
28. Shephard DD. Nonformal education for improving educational outcomes for street children and street youth in developing countries: A systematic review. Int J Soc Welf. 2014;23(4):349-361. doi:10.1111/ijsw.12080
29. Thongmixay S, Essink DR, De Greeuw T, Vongxay V, Sychareun V, Broerse JEW. Perceived barriers in accessing sexual and reproductive health services for youth in Lao People’s Democratic Republic. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):1-16. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218296
30. Zheng SX, Sun CH, Chen JJJJJJ, et al. Antifibrotic effects of hypocalcemic vitamin D analogs in murine and human hepatic stellate cells and in the CCl4 mouse model. Poult Sci. 2022;11(1):39-48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corcom.2022.03.004
31. Bagozzi RP, Dholakia UM. Intentional social action in virtual communities. J Interact Mark. 2002;12(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10006
32. Kumi R, Sabherwal R. Knowledge sharing behavior in online discussion communities: Examining behavior motivation from social and individual perspectives. Knowl Process Manag. 2019;26(2):110-122. doi:10.1002/kpm.1574
33. Heba AR. The effectiveness of online teaching and learning tools: Students’ perceptions of usefulness in an upper-level accounting course. Learn Teach. 2021;14(3):52-69. doi:10.3167/LATISS.2021.140304
34. Vongxay V, Thongmixay S, Stoltenborg L. Validation of the Questionnaire on Sexual and Reproductive Health Literacy for Adolescents Age 15 to 19 Years in Lao People ’ s Democratic Republic. 2022;6(1):37-50. doi:10.3928/24748307-20220207-01
35. Sai, F.T., Nassim J. The Need for a reproductive Health Approach. IntlJ Gynecol. 1989;3(3):103-113.
36. Irvine JM. Talk about Sex: The Battles Over Sex Education in the United States. Univ of California Press.; 2004.
37. Rashidi K, Watson P, Farahani H, Chesli RR, Abiri FA. Developing and validating the Sexual Health Literacy Scale in an Iranian adult sample. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):1-9. doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01669-z
38. Laski L, Wong S. Addressing diversity in adolescent sexual and reproductive health services. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2010;110(SUPPL.):S10-S12. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.04.011
39. Mbizvo MT, Chou D, Shaw D. Today’s evidence, tomorrow’s agenda: Implementation of strategies to improve global reproductive health. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2013;121(SUPPL1):S3-S8. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.02.007
40. Hobcraft G, Baker T. Special needs of adolescent and young women in accessing reproductive health: Promoting partnerships between young people and health care providers. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;94(3):350-356. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.04.024
Penulis

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.